Reasons Revisited
I thought of something I wanted to say as a follow up to my post about the Catholic Church and indulgences last week, specifically the part where I said
the major tension I’ve always felt running through Christian thought: on the one hand, there’s the notion that it’s all in God’s hands and we should trust that things happen for a reason and it will all work out. And on the other hand there’s the notion that what we do with our lives matters.
The way I wrote this, the tension is not exclusive to the Catholic Church – heck, it’s something I’ve commented about before, talking about the problem with explanations. But I do think the tension is especially noticeable in Catholicism and some other religions because there’s the additional assumption that the reason is a good reason, motivated by a benevolent and omnipotent planner. A determinist materialist doesn’t have to worry about why bad things happen to good people – they do because that’s the way the atoms bounce.
At any rate, I’ve been thinking about this tension a lot in the wake of the Chris Benoit murder story, as I read about people who knew Benoit try to reconcile their vision of him with what he had actually done. And I’ve seen people talk about steroids and stress and too many chair shots to the head in the effort to find a physical explanation.
And this may well seem odd, but the whole thing got me to thinking about Paul Hester, the original drummer for Crowded House. In 2005 Hester went out to walk his dogs and instead decided to hang himself. He left behind two young kids. And when I thought about how this would affect those kids, and then I thought about a man who would selfishly inflict that pain on his own children, I got pretty ticked off. And because I didn’t want to be angry at a dead guy, who I figure has enough problems, I tried to mitigate the act by reminding myself that Hester had always been subject to funks and may well have been clinically depressed, and so perhaps something in his body had simply overwhelmed him at that moment and made him unable to think through his actions. But if I try to follow that line of thinking, sure, I don’t have any reason to be mad at him anymore – but there’s not really much reason left to think positively, either. If the depression that drove him to suicide was merely a determined physical event, doesn’t the same thing hold true of his drumming talent and the sense of humor that helped define his band and earn him so many fans? Are there any heroes left to sheer for if we’re all just along for the ride?
Monday, July 2nd 2007 at 4:24 am |
I’ve never quite been able to let Hester off the hook myself, for precisely the reasons stated. I feel pity for him that he had problems, but the apparent casual nature of it all just throws me.
I’ve had the occasion to watch various debates and discussions unfold on a couple of different message boards regarding the Benoit case, and I’ve just been stunned by how far people will bend and twist to absolve the guy of, well, anything to do with it at all. And the mention of “‘roid rage” seems to bring that same crowd out in a cold sweat, as if it’s somehow inconceivable for someone in that sport…but is that actually less likely than, say, a wild theory about a mob hit?
Monday, July 2nd 2007 at 11:47 pm |
The casual nature almost makes me more inclined to the determinist point of view with Hester – sort of wondering must have happened in that moment to so completely overwhelm him.
To the extent that I’ve seen Benoit discussion, it’s been pretty levelheaded, but I haven’t been fishing for it. It’s just one of those things I know my head isn’t wrapping around any time soon.