I was working on a writeup of the ethics class I’m teaching, but then I started to wonder if that was a productive topic. Before I could make up my mind I found myself looking through some material by Zac Chase, currently doing graduate work in education at Harvard. I met Zac at a session at EduCon last year that I really enjoyed, and I’m getting a lot of vicarious education from following his work at HArvard on his blog, Autodizactic, and his Twitter feed. This will probably result in some interesting thoughts from me later (I hope), but for now, go check out Zac’s thoughts if you haven’t already.
Well, There Goes My Evening
Posted September 9, 2011 By Dave ThomerI am slightly bummed that I did not get to see The National when they performed in Philadelphia this week. But given that it’s the first week of school and we’ve had some wacky weather here in the city, I’d probably be re-enacting the song “Conversation 16” if I had tried to go to an evening concert during the work week. (The song is about someone concerned that he would eat someone else’s brain. I am implying that I would be a zombie if I went to the concert. I don’t know why Pattie says this band is depressing. End of digression.)
Anyway, I went to the band’s website and found that they had a link to the setlist for each show, which took me to a site called sitelist.fm that I had not previously known about. (Here’s Wednesday night’s set. Looks like a solid list.) The site is sort of a wiki dedicated to tracking concerts, and the setlists include links to YouTube videos of the songs. In this case they included a note that the Thursday concert had started late, so I’m really glad I took a pass on that one. I also went and looked up the last R.E.M. show I saw in Philly. (The National was the opening act that night, which is how I discovered the band. One more thing I owe R.E.M.) One of the things I really liked about that show was that Eddie Vedder came out and sang with the band on “Begin the Begin,” but Setlist.fm linked to a YouTube video from the band’s 2003 concert film Perfect Square. The sound quality was better on the DVD, of course, but this was a really cool moment to see live.
At any rate, I constantly manage to forget exactly which songs I’ve heard at concerts I’ve been to, so Setlist looks like a good site to keep in mind.
And while I’m embedding YouTube videos, check out The National playing “Afraid of Everyone” on Letterman. Awesome song.
An Argument for the Baseball Wild Card
Posted September 8, 2011 By Dave ThomerI almost feel bad for the Atlanta Braves. Right now they have an 84-60 record for a .583 winning percentage. They’d be leading three of baseball’s six divisions with that record and be tied in the loss column for the lead in a fourth.
But since the Phillies are having an insanely successful year, the Braves are 10 games out of first place in the National League East.
It does make me appreciate the wild card. If the goal is to have baseball’s best teams appear in the postseason tournament, I think the Braves pretty clearly should be there. Does it mean that the Phillies could wind up getting bounced from the playoffs by a team that they outperformed during the regular season? Yes, and if that happens I will be certainly be bummed. But that’s the way that playoffs bounce. They’re short series and the “best” team doesn’t always win. If that bothers you, that’s a reason to get rid of the playoffs and declare the team with the best regular season record the champion. I don’t see any league or television network going for that any time soon.
Give Them Shelter
Posted September 7, 2011 By Dave ThomerIn the ethics class I’m teaching, I’m trying to set up the idea that sometimes we have to make choices that will lead to the least-bad outcome. Such choices are where our values really get tested, because there’s no easy or safe choice. To think through the problem, I modified an exercise given to me by a colleague. Here’s what I gave the students:
Remember, you are likely to have to spend a lot of time in the shelter before the radiation levels go down. It could be years before the area is safe. These people are asking to enter:
• A Catholic priest, age 60, Hispanic male
• A medical researcher, age 40, African-American female, lawyer’s wife
• A lawyer, age 42, African-American male, medical researcher’s husband
• The researcher and lawyer’s daughter, age 16
• The researcher and lawyer’s son, age 10
• A commercial fisherman, age 36, Caucasian male
• A social worker, age 50, Caucasian female
• A college student, age 20, Hispanic female
• A musician, age 38, African-American male
• A city councilwoman, age 42, Japanese female
• A registered nurse, age 29, Saudi Arabian male
• A restaurant cook, age 34, African-American femaleChoose which eight people you would save and briefly say why. Do not consult with anyone about your answers.
We got a really good discussion out of it, and it was interesting to hear the students discuss and disagree about what was important. Keep a family together? Select people with useful expertise? Save the young? Save the elderly?
Next we’re going to look at Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron to discuss whether equality is always a good thing.
A Whole New Ball Game
Posted September 6, 2011 By Dave ThomerRead this story by Jayson Stark about how detailed scouting information on hitters in baseball is stored, analyzed, and disseminated. It’s a great piece of writing that dives into one of the big reasons that scoring in baseball is down. Teams now know so much about individual hitters’ tendencies that they can craft a specific game plan geared to exploiting each player’s weaknesses and getting them out.
Stark is a longtime Philadelphia resident, so it’s not surprising that he uses an example that’s familiar to most Phillies fans. Ryan Howard had a couple of gigantic offensive years when he first became a regular. But as teams gathered more data on him, they realized what a phenomenally bad idea it was to throw him a fastball, so they’ve done it less and less often. They also move their fielders from where they traditionally would position themselves to the spots where Howard usually hits the ball. The result is that while Howard has had good numbers since his early years, they haven’t been as good.
As Stark says, more and more teams are using “unconventional” defense on more and more hitters. Tampa Bay manager Joe Maddon sits down with an iPad each morning and combs through the statistics his organization has compiled in order to devise defensive positioning and pitching approaches for that night’s game.
There are a couple of things that fascinate me about this story. One is that I like the example of a way that technology has made specific information available and accessible. We hear a lot about how the Web and Google put a lot of general information at everyone’s fingertips, but this is much more detailed information than you find on Wikipedia or Retrosheet, and it’s easier for people to process because it can be presented using the iPad.
The other is that Stark suggests that even as Maddon’s Rays have shown a lot of success with their defensive shifts, many teams don’t replicate his aggressiveness because they’re too comfortable with traditional approaches. It’s an interesting example of how information can help you – if you’re willing to use it. That lesson applies to a lot more than just baseball.
Tomorrow We Begin Again
Posted September 5, 2011 By Dave ThomerNew school year starts in earnest tomorrow. I find myself very anxious right now, so much so that I’m finding it hard to focus on what I’m trying to write. I’m looking over my course syllabi, and feeling frustrated that they read more like a software End User License Agreement than the first step of a year of inquiry. I’m constantly asking myself how I’m going to encourage my students to ask more and better questions about the world around them and hoping that I am up to the task.
I’m also thinking about the site. I still have longer stories to write, and I want to start thinking more about how to use a tag cloud. Not News dates back to 2000, and there are a lot of things we weren’t thinking about in 2000 that we are today. I am also considering whether to use the site as a forum to re-evaluate some of the ideas in my dissertation. I think it’s time to refresh and renew some of my thinking there.
I almost but did not quite accomplish my goal of having the house (minus the garage) organized by the end of the summer, but I can keep working on that.
That’s probably the attitude I need to keep in mind right now. The summer’s over, but a new day starts tomorrow, and I need to get ready to make the most of it.
What’s a Computer For These Days?
Posted September 4, 2011 By Dave ThomerI have spent the last several months tracking websites and doing research in order to buy a new computer this holiday season. I’m thinking that instead of ordering from a place like Dell, I’ll go with one of the smaller operations that lets you pick exactly what pieces of hardware you want. So I know a lot more about cases and power supplies than I did when the summer started.
As much fun as I’m having, though, part of me wonders if I need a computer the way I used to. I bought my current desktop in 2006 when I was finishing my dissertation and needed to use a desktop publishing program to lay out the whole thing. Since then, I haven’t really been doing the graphic design or image editing that would require a really powerful machine.
I still do a decent amount of writing and reading on the Web, but I am very fortunate to have a school-issued laptop for that. I also use it to do my grading using a program provided by the school – although that’s changing to a web-based app, so by next year I may only need a tablet with Internet access to do my grades. The major drawback with the laptop is that I don’t love the laptop keyboard. It reminds me too much of the keyboards I used in college, when I wound up with a very sore left wrist. I have an ergonomic keyboard on my desktop. Thing is, the desktop is downstairs. The laptop lets me hang out in the living room or the dining room and not feel like I’m ignoring my family. I’ve started using Google Docs to do some of my writing and record-keeping, so I may not even need to buy a copy of Microsoft Office anymore.
If push came to shove I could probably do a lot of the reading and writing with a tablet, but as much fun as the iPad appears to be, I haven’t found the killer app that’s the reason to pick one up.
If I’m honest with myself, there is really only one reason why I am even thinking about buying a new computer, and that’s computer games. I would need to do some major upgrading to my current machine to be able to play Mass Effect 3 when it comes out, so it makes more sense to buy a new one. I’m hoping that if I do get an upgraded desktop, I’ll try to do some video editing or other projects for school that will leverage all that power. I’ll probably pick up a Blu-Ray drive to see if that’s worthwhile. But right now, I don’t know if there are that many tasks on my To Do list that require all the computing power that Intel and company are making available.
Still, in the end, I guess I’ll think of something.
Come On George, Revise It Like You Mean It
Posted September 3, 2011 By Dave ThomerAnyone who doubted that George Lucas was going to make more changes to the Star Wars movies got a rude awakening this week when various sites reported that Lucas has added blinking Ewoks, additional desert rocks, and anguished Skywalkers yelling “NO!” in climactic scenes. Plenty of people are upset about this, and we’ll see whether this affects sales of the Blu-Rays coming out this month. But I’m going to take a different tack. At this point, I don’t think Lucas has gone too far. I don’t think he’s gone far enough.
He should just bite the bullet and remake Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi.
Maybe he doesn’t want to trudge back to Tunisia. Fine. Do them as animated films, in the same style as the Clone Wars TV show. Use the original soundtracks if he likes, or hire new actors to do the voices. Heck, since Lucas has managed to create a whole new audience of Star Wars fans who know Cad Bane better than Lobot, an animated version of Luke and Leia’s story might be just what the doctor ordered.
‘Cause here’s the thing. Movies filmed with 70s and 80s technology are never gonna look the way 2011 George Lucas wants them to, and they probably won’t look like 1976 George Lucas wanted them to either. But slapping some 2011 effects on a frame here and there and trying to edit in a few bits of dialogue to the audio track is just going to call attention to the patch job. Nobody’s satisfied. So go ahead. Start from scratch. Stick Emperor Palpatine in Episode IV. Show Bail Organa trying to save Alderaan. Do all the crazy effects shots you want. Those of us with fond memories of 1977 through 1983 can hang out with our VHS, laserdisc and DVD copies, and the audience that likes the prequels and TV show can see the story end in a way that’s familiar to them.
And then, some time in 2027, he can start all over again. Yeah, he’ll be 83, but I expect he’ll have himself digitized by then anyway.
No Teacher Is an Island
Posted September 2, 2011 By Dave ThomerHad a chance to spend some time brainstorming with my colleagues about things we can do during the year to reinforce each other and help students see connections across our different subjects. I talked about the tools that I’m going to emphasize in trying to help students work through their readings. One of those tools is cause and effect relationships, and the science teacher said that she might wind up giving the students a different definition than the one that I would use. We went back and forth a few times before I clicked in to what she meant.
In history, we talk about one thing causing another, but we are almost never giving an exhaustive description of the causes. Human events are so complex that there’s never a single cause, and getting a comprehensive explanation for one event can take up a healthy portion of a graduate seminar. When you have one week to spend on the entire Renaissance, you’re not going down to that level of detail. So you focus on the big causes, but you don’t always have a chance to focus on the little details that make a situation unique. You might say “The citizens rebelled because the government raised taxes very high,” but you’re not asserting that every time a government raises taxes the citizens are going to rebel. It’s more of a general guide than an absolute rule.
Science tends to be looking more for the absolute rule. Exceptions are the sort of thing that can falsify a hypothesis. So when my science teacher colleague talks about causes and effects, she’s using a stronger standard. You don’t just say “Heating water to 100 degrees Celsius causes it to boil,” because there are times when you can heat it that high and it doesn’t. You have to introduce the concept of air pressure in order to more fully understand the cause and effect relationship at work.
Once we had talked through this, we realized that rather than seem to contradict each other, we could support each other’s definition by explaining the different level of detail and specificity that each class was looking for. That helps the students build a level of adaptability into their thinking, and I think that’s useful on top of the other skills we’re trying to build. And we would not have had that insight if we had not had that time to trade ideas. One of the best things about being a teacher is getting to talk to other teachers every day.
The Value of My College Education
Posted September 1, 2011 By Dave ThomerStarted a new school year today, although the students aren’t back yet. That’ll happen over the next couple of days. But the start of the year has me thinking back. 15 years ago I started my senior ear of college at Fordham University. I’ve been thinking about that a lot lately, because I absolutely would not trade my college experience for just about anything. And since now it’s my job to help high school students prepare to have similarly rewarding experiences, I have to think about why it was so valuable to me.
Certainly there was an academic component. I built a strong foundation in my coursework that helped me get into grad school. I barely had any adjuncts or TAs in four years of classes. Heck, my roommate from junior year is a veterinarian, my roommate from senior year is a medical doctor, and two of my editors-in-chief from the newspaper went on to get doctoral degrees. Lots of my friends were no less brilliant for not getting time-consuming and expensive terminal degrees. (Some folks might say that makes them even more brilliant, but that’s just my student loan debt talking.) Rubbing against all that brain power in classrooms and in late-night conversations was a great experience that sped up my thinking and development on a lot of topics.
But the truth is, I was a humanities major. I could get Plato’s Republic out of the library a lot cheaper than I got it from the campus bookstore, let alone the tuition. With the Internet today making more video lectures and discussion for a possible, the truth is that someone who is truly interested in learning the material for the sake of learning the material, rather than getting a credential to tick off a box on a job application, can do so without the actual college experience.
I still feel like I got a lot of value from college. There is a social element, of course. I met many of my best friends at Fordham, and 15 years ago I started dating Pattie. 12 years of marriage and one wonderful daughter later, that seems to be working out. College can’t help but introduce you to a bunch of people, and if you play your cards right you’ll find people you can connect with. There are lots of people in the world, though, so if you keep your eyes open you could probably make friends without college, too.
The thing is, it was easier for me to learn that material and easier for me to make those friends because the traditional college experience was, for me, its own little isolated world, a microcosm that brought a lot of people into a relatively confined environment and forced them to bounce off of one another. It accelerated the processes. And because it was a small world, I could explore many different sides of it. In college, I was an academic. I was a journalist and writer. I was a program planner. I wrote a screenplay; I co-wrote a play and got to have it staged. I lived on my own for the first time without having to worry about every single detail that being independent requires. I got to grow up, figure out who I wanted to be and build up some resources to help me become that person. For me, it worked, and that’s why I will forever be grateful to Fordham.