Author Archive

The Empire Is Back – Part 2

Posted May 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

In May of 2001, DC announced that they would publish Mark Waid and Barry Kitson’s Empire, a series centered around a successful world conqueror and the intrigues that surround him. I talked to Kitson back then about the book and his plans; Now, Empire is finally back, with a reprint of the original issues now on the stands and a brand new issue slated to arrive in July. It seemed like as good a time as any to check back in with Kitson. The following conversation took place via e-mail in late April and early May:

DT: We’re coming up on almost two full years since the first announcement that Empire would move to DC. Can you talk a little bit about the process of getting the series going again? Has it taken longer than you expected?

BK: It has taken longer to get the book back in the schedules than we’d hoped — it was really just a question of logistics. Mark and I never actually stopped talking over ideas and plots for the series, but Andy Helfer had asked if I would help out on Titans and that ended up taking more time from my schedule than we’d expected. DC to their credit were very good about waiting to schedule Empire until we knew we could put all the time into it that we wanted. Empire means a lot to Mark and me so we really wanted it to be right this time!

DT: How much time do you like to devote to Empire? Is it something you feel you can work on simultaneously with another project, or do you have to focus on it exclusively?

BK: I always prefer to work on one thing at a time when I can. If I have more than one project in progress I’ll assign specific days to a single task – for example Monday = Cover for project ‘a’, Tuesday = Empire interiors. Usually with a story I like to work on it unbroken so I can get totally immersed in it. At the moment Empire is taking priority over everything else. If there’s a little down time on Empire for any reason then I’ll get to working on preparatory stuff for JSA etc.

DT: What’s it like coming back to a project like this after so much time away? Is it a challenge to figure out how a concept (and two stories) from 2000 fit into your thinking and style in 2003?

BK: Well as I said we really never felt like we left the project. We’ve actually been talking about Empire for a long long time. Well before the Gorilla Comics issues — in fact even before JLA Year One! The concept hasn’t undergone any major change since 2000 . . . just continued to evolve the more we discuss it. Fundamentally things are the same — we had most of the major ideas behind the first story arc pretty well mapped out when we began . . . the biggest difficulty is probably that we’ve had two years to think of new ideas we want to throw in so it gets harder and harder to fit everything into the structure we originally thought of! We probably have enough ideas to fill about twice as many pages as we actually requested for this first arc.

I guess you might feel world events have thrown the story into a somewhat different light too — but you’ll have to read the story to judge how that might work.

I think there is a slightly ‘different’ style to the artwork from the original issues– due to my ‘natural progression’ over the time that’s passed . . . it would have been nice to redraw some of the original pages perhaps but not really practical. (I’d probably redraw everything I’ve ever done given the chance 🙂 )

As far as the stories go, each issues was designed to be able to stand alone– the idea being that you could pick up any issue of Empire and get a whole story from it, but that story would take on extra significance if you had the whole series to refer to. Some things that might seem quite minor in #2 might take on a great significance in the light of #5 say.

The extra good news is that with DC reprinting the original Gorilla issues as #0 – everyone can get immediately up to speed with events if they’d like to!

DT: So if this first arc goes well, it won’t be lack of ideas that stops you and Mark from putting out more, I take it. Are you hoping to put out more miniseries somewhere down the road? What has to happen to make that feasible?

BK: If enough people enjoy Empire we’d pretty much like it to be an ongoing project. Basically if the market place is willing to support it we’d like to keep going until the whole saga is told. It’s a project that we both really enjoy and would like to keep working on whenever we can. Maybe releasing it in volumes — just as these first eight issues make up volume one. Joey Cavalieri our editor at DC has been really supportive and indicated that he’d be happy to take the hot seat again if things go well — so we’ll keep our fingers crossed that the readers enjoy it as much as we hope they will!

DT: On your website, you have the pencils for the cover of issue zero, along with an unused design for that cover. What’s the thought process that goes into designing a cover? What makes the final version better than the initial proposal? (See both designs.)

BK: With any cover I try to submit a whole bunch of sketches– all of which I like– and see how everyone else involved feels about them. Usually I have a personal favorite, but it’s always interesting to see how others react to the choices they see. In the case of the #0 cover I knew I wanted to have a lot of the cast on it so that readers would know the book is an ‘ensemble’ work rather than focused on one character. Because of the multi-layered nature of the book I had been using a montage approach on some of the covers– notably #1 and #2 and thought perhaps we should carry this over to the #0 issue, but I also really liked the idea of one dramatic image for this first . The image actually symbolically represents a lot of what the first series arc is about– but rather than explain that in detail, I’d best wait until everyone’s had a chance to read all the issues.

Anyway . . . when I submitted the two sketches everyone chose the one we used as being their favorite (it was the one I wanted to do too so that worked out well).

So to come back to your question– the choice really comes down to which design does every feel works best for the job we want it to do. With the #0 we wanted a design that would catch the eye– suggest something of the nature of the story and intrigue people enough to pick the book up. I think the rejected design did most of those things, but in a somewhat ‘quieter’ way than the one we chose– maybe it would have been better suited to a mid-run issue? Anyway– please feel free to check them both out and form your own opinions . . . as with most things artistic there’s no right or wrong answer 😉

DT: You just finished a run as artist for DC’s now-canceled Titans series. What do you think of your run on the book? What did you get out of the experience that you think will benefit your future projects?

BK: Hmmmm that’s a tough one! LOL! To be honest I never felt I got the chance to do with the Titans many of the things I would have liked. I really like the characters and very much wanted to draw them– I also had some pretty strong ideas of how I felt the book needed changing. Anyway — to cut a long story short – the book got caught up in the decision making processes at the company and sort of went into a holding pattern while its future was worked out. I guess the experience taught me that you can’t do as well as you’d like in those sort of circumstances. It was entirely my choice to stay with the book while it was in that position as I didn’t want to ‘abandon ship’ and leave the editor, writer etc. searching for an artist while it was happening, but it wasn’t really the assignment that I’d hoped for when I agreed to do it. Though I did enjoy drawing the characters the run was ultimately a little frustrating as I know we could have done better given the chance. I always want to give 100% creative input to any book I’m working on and I don’t feel I really had chance to do that on Titans. I guess the experience has taught me only to work on things in circumstances I am entirely comfortable with in the future! 🙂

DT: You have a couple of projects with DC’s JSA coming up as well, including a pretty lengthy one down the road. What can you say about that and your other upcoming work?

BK: The first JSA work is the lead story in one of the JSA-All Stars series that’s coming out the week of July 2nd — I think it’s in #3. Written by Geoff Johns and David Goyer, it’s a story featuring Dr. Fate. It was a real pleasure to draw! (See a page from this story.)

I think my enjoyment of the story must have shown in the artwork as when Peter Tomasi, the editor, saw the pages he decided to offer me a whole series featuring the JSA! I can’t reveal too much about it as yet, but it’ll be nearly 200 pages in length and a lot of fun to draw! 🙂

I’ve also been offered some work for Marvel which is quite exciting as I’ve not really had chance to draw many of their characters in the past.

DT: Is the JSA another case like Titans, where you had a previous fondness for the characters?

BK: Absolutely! There’s a special place in my heart for the JSA — I used to love the annual Justice League/Justice Society crossovers of the Silver Age — and just as with JLA Year One — with the JSA project I’m getting a chance to draw characters that were part of the excitement I got from reading comics as a kid. I’m doing the stories I always dreamed I’d get to draw when I first decided I wanted to draw comics!

DT: What is it in particular about the Fate story that you think turned out so well?

BK: Well basically I think it was a really well written story – and it was something of a change of pace, something a little different for me to tackle , but you’ll have to read it to understand how . . . I enjoyed being able to work on something that seems like it will have real repercussions in the characters’ lives. It was a real pleasure to work with Geoff and David — Geoff and I had been talking about working together for years and when the chance came up I was glad to grab it! I hope we’ll get the chance to do it again soon! It’s always nice working for Peter Tomasi too so everything about the project just ‘clicked,’ nicely.

DT: Do you think the experience on Titans would motivate you to try and take on more original projects like Empire down the road? Or do you think you can still feel comfortable in the somewhat tighter confines of company-owned characters?

BK: There are plus and minuses to both situations — certainly the freedom of owning a property like Empire is fantastic — it’s great to know you can take the story anywhere you like, but for the long-time comic fan in me there’s a real magic to being able to draw my version of long-standing characters, which is why the JSA project is such a treat for me! Ideally I’d like to continue to live in both worlds — making a choice would be very difficult. Doing one ‘company project’ and one ‘original’ project a year would be the perfect option I guess…but maybe that’s like trying to have the cake and eat it too!

DT: You’ve made a few comments about reviving your L.E.G.I.O.N. series down the road. How do the prospects look for that?

BK: At the moment they look a bit distant — we had been planning and had a proposal for a JLA/L.E.G.I.O.N. mini series to re-establish the characters in the DCU, but with the JSA series and Empire keeping me busy for the foreseeable future I can’t really see much chance of it coming about for some time. I would definitely like to work on the characters again — I thoroughly enjoyed all my time on the book and they seem very fondly remembered by an awful lot of fans so it would be nice to see them as an integral part of DC continuity again.

DT: A bit of a more general and technical question — what materials do you use in the various stages of putting a page together? How do you select those particular tools?

BK: Now that’s a question I could probably fill several pages answering. I have at least three different approaches to putting pages together and tend to opt for which ever one I feel like on any given day!

The one constant is to always start with a thumbnail sketch — very simply drawn and about 2 inches by three inches in size. This is where the basic content of each panel is decided on and the overall design of the page worked out. If you can tell what’s happening in these and they look interesting it’s a fair bet the page will work okay when you’ve drawn it up.

After this stage things can go all sorts of different ways. Sometimes I’ll then draw the whole page up full size in blue pencil – which doesn’t reproduce when scanned — and has a softer feel than regular pencil leads.

Sometimes I’ll draw a version of the page at reproduction size after the thumbnails the drawings at this stage will be mostly just outlines. When I do this I tend to next put the page under tracing paper and using felt tip brush pens fill in all the blacks so that I end up with a version of the page that has NO outlines only positive and negative spaces. It’s another way of being able to judge the mood of a page and how the reader’s eyes will be guided around the panels.

A third method is to draw roughs of each of the panels individually — scan them into a computer and put the page together as a composite based on the thumbnail design.

Whichever method I’m using at this point I end up with a scanned rough of the page in the computer. The great thing about getting to this stage is that once the roughs are in the computer you can manipulate the drawings in all sorts of different ways, resizing, flipping etc etc until you are really happy with how things are going to look. Through rather arcane processes in Photoshop I’ll then create a faint blueline version of the final page. I print this onto the board I’ll be using — so faint that it’s barely visible — and then go to work with a selection of pencils — again whatever feels right at the time, usually a combination of 0.3 automatic pencils and good old fashioned wooden ones.

Once the page is drawn, if I’m going to inks I use brushes almost exclusively. . . the only things I use pens for are straight lines and circles generally. I use Kolinsky sable brushes and India ink . . . which I usually boil for a while to get to decent thickness so that it gives a nice dense black. (See the progression of the cover for Empire 0 here.)

There’s loads more minutia and variations I could go into — but I think that roughly explains how I approach things.

BK: Well basically I think it was a really well written story – and it was something of a change of pace, something a little different for me to tackle , but you’ll have to read it to understand how . . . I enjoyed being able to work on something that seems like it will have real repercussions in the characters’ lives. It was a real pleasure to work with Geoff and David — Geoff and I had been talking about working together for years and when the chance came up I was glad to grab it! I hope we’ll get the chance to do it again soon! It’s always nice working for Peter Tomasi too so everything about the project just ‘clicked,’ nicely.

DT: Do you think the experience on Titans would motivate you to try and take on more original projects like Empire down the road? Or do you think you can still feel comfortable in the somewhat tighter confines of company-owned characters?

BK: There are plus and minuses to both situations — certainly the freedom of owning a property like Empire is fantastic — it’s great to know you can take the story anywhere you like, but for the long-time comic fan in me there’s a real magic to being able to draw my version of long-standing characters, which is why the JSA project is such a treat for me! Ideally I’d like to continue to live in both worlds — making a choice would be very difficult. Doing one ‘company project’ and one ‘original’ project a year would be the perfect option I guess…but maybe that’s like trying to have the cake and eat it too!

DT: You’ve made a few comments about reviving your L.E.G.I.O.N. series down the road. How do the prospects look for that?

BK: At the moment they look a bit distant — we had been planning and had a proposal for a JLA/L.E.G.I.O.N. mini series to re-establish the characters in the DCU, but with the JSA series and Empire keeping me busy for the foreseeable future I can’t really see much chance of it coming about for some time. I would definitely like to work on the characters again — I thoroughly enjoyed all my time on the book and they seem very fondly remembered by an awful lot of fans so it would be nice to see them as an integral part of DC continuity again.

DT: A bit of a more general and technical question — what materials do you use in the various stages of putting a page together? How do you select those particular tools?

BK: Now that’s a question I could probably fill several pages answering. I have at least three different approaches to putting pages together and tend to opt for which ever one I feel like on any given day!

The one constant is to always start with a thumbnail sketch — very simply drawn and about 2 inches by three inches in size. This is where the basic content of each panel is decided on and the overall design of the page worked out. If you can tell what’s happening in these and they look interesting it’s a fair bet the page will work okay when you’ve drawn it up.

After this stage things can go all sorts of different ways. Sometimes I’ll then draw the whole page up full size in blue pencil – which doesn’t reproduce when scanned — and has a softer feel than regular pencil leads.

Sometimes I’ll draw a version of the page at reproduction size after the thumbnails the drawings at this stage will be mostly just outlines. When I do this I tend to next put the page under tracing paper and using felt tip brush pens fill in all the blacks so that I end up with a version of the page that has NO outlines only positive and negative spaces. It’s another way of being able to judge the mood of a page and how the reader’s eyes will be guided around the panels.

A third method is to draw roughs of each of the panels individually — scan them into a computer and put the page together as a composite based on the thumbnail design.

Whichever method I’m using at this point I end up with a scanned rough of the page in the computer. The great thing about getting to this stage is that once the roughs are in the computer you can manipulate the drawings in all sorts of different ways, resizing, flipping etc etc until you are really happy with how things are going to look. Through rather arcane processes in Photoshop I’ll then create a faint blueline version of the final page. I print this onto the board I’ll be using — so faint that it’s barely visible — and then go to work with a selection of pencils — again whatever feels right at the time, usually a combination of 0.3 automatic pencils and good old fashioned wooden ones.

Once the page is drawn, if I’m going to inks I use brushes almost exclusively. . . the only things I use pens for are straight lines and circles generally. I use Kolinsky sable brushes and India ink . . . which I usually boil for a while to get to decent thickness so that it gives a nice dense black. (See the progression of the cover for Empire 0 here.)

There’s loads more minutia and variations I could go into — but I think that roughly explains how I approach things.

It’s the Right Thing to Do – I Think

Posted May 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

Harvard philosopher Hilary Putnam has argued that while Dewey’s pragmatism is a strong foundation for social ethics, it falls short as a means for individuals to answer questions about how they should act in a particular situation, or what they should believe – the questions through which we discover and become who we are. These are questions about what is the right thing to do at a given moment, and it is often the case that multiple options seem viable – it is not possible to eliminate, through some process of investigation or deduction, all but one option on the grounds that the others are obviously wrong or unsupportable, or that one response has no flaws while all others do. Putnam cites the case of Pierre, who must choose between leaving home to join the Resistance during World War II, or staying home to take care of his elderly and ailing mother. To a disinterested observer, both options seem viable, and there does not appear to be a rule or formula to settle the matter and provide an answer that would be universally agreed upon. “Neither of the alternatives he is considering is in any way stupid. Yet he cannot just flip a coin.”(1)
Read the remainder of this entry »

The Empire Is Back

Posted May 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

In May of 2001, DC announced that they would publish Mark Waid and Barry Kitson’s Empire, a series centered around a successful world conqueror and the intrigues that surround him. I talked to Kitson back then about the book and his plans; Now, Empire is finally back, with a reprint of the original issues now on the stands and a brand new issue slated to arrive in July. It seemed like as good a time as any to check back in with Kitson. The following conversation took place via e-mail in late April and early May:

DT: We’re coming up on almost two full years since the first announcement that Empire would move to DC. Can you talk a little bit about the process of getting the series going again? Has it taken longer than you expected?

BK: It has taken longer to get the book back in the schedules than we’d hoped — it was really just a question of logistics. Mark and I never actually stopped talking over ideas and plots for the series, but Andy Helfer had asked if I would help out on Titans and that ended up taking more time from my schedule than we’d expected. DC to their credit were very good about waiting to schedule Empire until we knew we could put all the time into it that we wanted. Empire means a lot to Mark and me so we really wanted it to be right this time!

DT: How much time do you like to devote to Empire? Is it something you feel you can work on simultaneously with another project, or do you have to focus on it exclusively?

BK: I always prefer to work on one thing at a time when I can. If I have more than one project in progress I’ll assign specific days to a single task – for example Monday = Cover for project ‘a’, Tuesday = Empire interiors. Usually with a story I like to work on it unbroken so I can get totally immersed in it. At the moment Empire is taking priority over everything else. If there’s a little down time on Empire for any reason then I’ll get to working on preparatory stuff for JSA etc.

DT: What’s it like coming back to a project like this after so much time away? Is it a challenge to figure out how a concept (and two stories) from 2000 fit into your thinking and style in 2003?

BK: Well as I said we really never felt like we left the project. We’ve actually been talking about Empire for a long long time. Well before the Gorilla Comics issues — in fact even before JLA Year One! The concept hasn’t undergone any major change since 2000 . . . just continued to evolve the more we discuss it. Fundamentally things are the same — we had most of the major ideas behind the first story arc pretty well mapped out when we began . . . the biggest difficulty is probably that we’ve had two years to think of new ideas we want to throw in so it gets harder and harder to fit everything into the structure we originally thought of! We probably have enough ideas to fill about twice as many pages as we actually requested for this first arc.

I guess you might feel world events have thrown the story into a somewhat different light too — but you’ll have to read the story to judge how that might work.

I think there is a slightly ‘different’ style to the artwork from the original issues– due to my ‘natural progression’ over the time that’s passed . . . it would have been nice to redraw some of the original pages perhaps but not really practical. (I’d probably redraw everything I’ve ever done given the chance )

As far as the stories go, each issue was designed to be able to stand alone– the idea being that you could pick up any issue of Empire and get a whole story from it, but that story would take on extra significance if you had the whole series to refer to. Some things that might seem quite minor in #2 might take on a great significance in the light of #5 say.

The extra good news is that with DC reprinting the original Gorilla issues as #0 – everyone can get immediately up to speed with events if they’d like to!

DT: So if this first arc goes well, it won’t be lack of ideas that stops you and Mark from putting out more, I take it. Are you hoping to put out more miniseries somewhere down the road? What has to happen to make that feasible?

BK: If enough people enjoy Empire we’d pretty much like it to be an ongoing project. Basically if the market place is willing to support it we’d like to keep going until the whole saga is told. It’s a project that we both really enjoy and would like to keep working on whenever we can. Maybe releasing it in volumes — just as these first eight issues make up volume one. Joey Cavalieri our editor at DC has been really supportive and indicated that he’d be happy to take the hot seat again if things go well — so we’ll keep our fingers crossed that the readers enjoy it as much as we hope they will!

Everybody’s a Critic

Posted May 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

Readers of this site are probably aware of my fondness for Pete Yorn’s musicforthemorningafter. So you can probably imagine that my hackles were pretty well raised by Kevin Canfield’s recent Salon article “This Year’s Model,� in which Canfield says, among other things, “In a way, Yorn is everything that is wrong with contemporary rock and pop.� Obviously, I disagree, but I was prepared to write it off as a disagreement of taste until Canfield explains exactly what way he means: “The epitome of a mediocre (but carefully packaged) soulful white boy who looks good in publicity photos, he represents something very bad and very annoying about the relationship between labels and the rock writers who make careers of regurgitating press releases.�

In other words, Yorn isn’t bad just because his music isn’t very good. He’s bad because Columbia Records has gone to great lengths to say that Yorn is good, and because rock critics like Rolling Stone’s Arion Berger (who gave music a four-star review) have blindly gone along with the label to perpetuate this obvious falsehood. But all is not lost, Canfield says. Rock critics aren’t dumb sycophants all of the time, although he adds, “You might be excused for thinking that, though, if you look at all the ink still devoted to a band like Pearl Jam, all the praise heaped on Springsteen’s simply awful The Rising, or the fact that some critics are actually paying any attention at all to Lisa Marie Presley.â€? Occasionally, though, they show some sense and agree with Canfield. Read the remainder of this entry »

Democracy: Start at the Beginning

Posted April 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

Continuing our discussion of the theoretical questions a democratic reformer in the Deweyan tradition would need to answer:

A properly-functioning reform organization is itself a community within the larger society; its members should feel a bond with each other and be aware of the effect their actions have on the group as a whole and their individual colleagues. This community is itself a smaller public, looking to discover itself and organize itself appropriately. Since its members presumably share an awareness of this need and are actively engaged in the process, one would expect the reform organization to be further along in organizing itself than the larger society. It is vital, then, that reformers organize themselves as much as possible along democratic lines.

While it is relatively unlikely that charges of hypocrisy would be a non-democratic reform organization’s major challenge, it makes sense to avoid the problem if at all possible. More significantly, it is almost certain that at least some reformers would be aware of the conflict between the organization’s goals and the methods it used to achieve them. This will in turn almost certainly damage morale and reduce the reformer’s effectiveness. It is useful to raise a person’s awareness of conflict between important beliefs if you want to slow that person’s actions and make him think about those beliefs, but counterproductive when you are trying to motivate direct action. The commitment to democracy, once made after careful reasoning, must be carried through.
Read the remainder of this entry »

Who’s Your Daddy?

Posted April 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

I’m typing this right now with a napping toddler in my lap, so if mid-sentence I start waving my foot around to knock out the pins and needles, I hope you’ll understand.

That’s just one of the little adjustments you have to make when you become a parent, I suppose. It’s been a year since Alexandra was born, and it’s certainly been an adjustment. Without a doubt it’s the most amazing experience I’ve ever had, but there are a few things I’ve had to learn over the months. Some of this stuff we’ve discussed elsewhere on the forums, but I figured the one-year mark was a good point to try and pull some reflections together.

Sufferin’ Sleep Cycles!: I’ve definitely whined about this before, but one of the more frustrating elements of fatherhood has been the degree to which my already-fragile sleep cycle has been blown to bits. Since she was born, Alex hasn’t stuck to one sleep pattern for more than a week, and she has always slept less than every source we’ve consulted suggests she will. A few times we’ve been lucky and she’s settled into a 10 PM-to-6 AM pattern for a few days, but before long we’re jumping to 9 AM-to-3 PM or 1 PM-to-8 PM. Attempts to follow the old ‘sleep when the baby sleeps’ credo have met with limited success, because my body doesn’t snap around as easily as hers does, which means that when I do lay down, I often crash harder and longer than I want to. (That’s part of why I’m writing this now, while she sleeps. I’m hoping that if I can start forcing myself into a rhythm, I can get her to follow along. Even if it doesn’t work, I might get a little more work done.)

The problem is compounded somewhat because we’ve adopted a parenting style that Pattie says is called ‘attachment parenting,’ and which I call ‘carrying the kid everywhere.’ Alex has disliked her crib almost from the get-go. Her first night home, she kept us both up until 7 or 8 AM, howling whenever we put her in her bassinet. Things haven’t changed much in the last year, and we never were able to bring ourselves around to the ‘let her cry it out’ approach. I admit, there are times when I’ll put her in her crib out of frustration, but never for more than twenty minutes or so, by which point she’s only gotten warmed up as far as a crying jag goes. If you were to say we were spoiling the baby, at this point, I’m not sure I’d argue with you. But I think there are benefits. Alex is an enthusiastic, happy, outgoing kid. She smiles and waves at people, laughs and smiles a lot, and seems to have a lot of confidence as she’s exploring the apartment.

They Learn Fast: One thing that has amazed me is how quickly Alex has come to notice patterns and recognize things. I’ve mentioned this before, but she knows the sound of Pattie walking up the steps on her way home from work, and gets so excited when she hears it. She also has seemed to recognize music almost from day one. From an early age, she has registered a preference for up-tempo music, and her favorite lullabies appear to be Pete Yorn’s “Life on a Chain� and Joie Calio’s “Stupid Songs About Love.� She also recognizes television theme music. She loves the ‘Across the Stars’ video from my Attack of the Clones DVD, and waves her hands excitedly at the themes from Farscape, Babylon 5, and, um, Trading Spaces. (That one’s more from Pattie.)

She also recognizes much of the music from Sesame Street, which she’s started to watch in the last month or so. It’s clearly too early for her to be recognizing many of the concepts, and I’ve even seen a newspaper story where one of the show’s producers thinks that 2 is a good minimum age for watching the show. But she recognizes the music and the characters and seems to enjoy watching them. Of course, this has led Pattie and me to watch the show as well, which often induces nostalgia for when we watched the show. Many of the classic Muppet performers have left the show, leaving the characters in the hands of quite-capable replacements . . . but sometimes it still feels a little off. And of course there’s Elmo, the Muppet embodiment of some kind of generational dividing line. At least Alex has shown an equal fondness for Ernie.

Daddy on Board: Being a stay at home dad has its own challenges, as does being the gainfully employed mom. It’s just not the expected breakdown of roles, and it tends to throw people off. Usually it’s just a matter of the odd comment or two, which is no big deal. But sometimes I run across more concrete reminders that we just don’t seem to expect dads to be heavily involved in the early years of child-rearing. We got a few volumes of a well-known series of parenting books as gifts while we were expecting, and when I sat down to read them I quickly found myself putting them down. The books were completely written to the point of view of mothers, and just about the only mention of fathers was in the ‘If your husband wants to try and help you out for an afternoon, here’s how to keep him from screwing up too badly, given that he doesn’t know anything’ vein. Lest you think I’m being overly defensive, Pattie’s made the same comments. And, illustrative of how lucky both Alex and I are, she made sure to do something about it, getting me a copy of Armin Brott’s The New Father: A Dad’s Guide to the First Year. The book covers the different emotional issues that fathers tend to experience whether they’re stay-at-home dads or more traditional working dads. But it still includes enough general advice and information that Pattie has read the book herself a couple of times and found it helpful. It just feels to me like we need to be doing a better job of adjusting our expectations when it comes to parenting and gender roles.

Keep Those Hankies Handy: The last thing I’ve noticed is that parenthood has stripped away whatever sense of emotional restraint I might have had. I tend to get overcome with emotion a lot more easily these days than before Alex was born, and I was never all that restrained to begin with. But now, it’s almost comical how easily I can be moved to tears. I should have known this was coming – my mother tends to be the same way – but it’s hard to estimate the impact of a small person snuggling up to your shoulder and falling asleep until you experience it. And that’s worth all the missed sleep in the world.

Permission to Speak Franklin

Posted March 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

The image of Benjamin Franklin looms large over Philadelphia – residents and visitors to the city can drive on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway to visit the Franklin Institute, perhaps after driving across the Benjamin Franklin Bridge from New Jersey. A half hour from Center City sits Franklin Mills Mall, which uses a number of Franklin icons to reinforce its regional identity, including a kite and lightning bolt and an enormous mechanical replica of Franklin’s head in the mall’s center court. Clearly, Franklin has a strong hold over his adopted home; the Smithsonian Institution’s Inventory of American Sculpture says that there are 41 statues of Franklin in the city. No other public figure has nearly that many statues devoted to him or her in any American city. There are 16 statues of George Washington in the nation’s capital; 14 of Abraham Lincoln in his home town.

To a Philadelphia native, Franklin’s near omnipresence seems perfectly natural – but as Philadelphia Inquirer writer Carrie Rickey commented in an October 10, 1999 article, “some of us who come from elsewhere are initially overwhelmed by Ben. We suffer from Benphobia. Philadelphia artist Flash Rosenberg dubbed this syndrome “the Bends.’â€? The comment was in part tongue-in-cheek, but it does raise questions. On what is our admiration of Franklin based? What do the images of Franklin convey to those who are unfamiliar? And does the abundance of portrayals of Franklin help give Philadelphians an understanding of the nature of the man and his accomplishments, as well as the revolutionary period in which he lived? A few years ago, I did a bit of a walking tour of the most prominent Franklin displays; I could go on at great length on the subject, but for now I want to focus on the portrayals of Franklin at two major Philadelphia institutions: the Franklin Institute, and the University of Pennsylvania. While certainly not a representative sample, they do illustrate some of the pitfalls of using public art as a means to create public awareness of history. Read the remainder of this entry »

Swimming Up Mainstream

Posted March 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

A few weeks ago I was channel surfing and came across a showing of Braveheart. This is not all that surprising; the movie’s been on cable for a while now. What was more than a little surprising was that the movie was playing on the Sci Fi Channel. Now, I’ve heard that Braveheart plays fast and loose with historical fact, but that alone doesn’t qualify something as science fiction, does it?

As it turns out, the Braveheart showing was just part of a general strategy by Sci Fi to try to broaden its programming. Alleged psychics, dream interpreters, and scary hoax-meisters have all been added to the network’s schedule over the last few years, and network head Bonnie Hammer has given numerous quotes in interviews that suggest the network wants to be less oriented to spaceships, technology and other things that people might think of as science fiction. That change in direction has probably contributed to the cancellation of (what used to be) Sci Fi’s flagship series Farscape, along with Sci Fi’s decision to pass on two possible series by Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski. Needless to say, there are quite a few disgruntled fans out there who wonder why a network called the Sci Fi Channel would abandon science fiction in order to pursue the mainstream.

Me, I have another question: how did we ever get to the point where science fiction isn’t considered the mainstream? Read the remainder of this entry »

Icons and Ignorance

Posted March 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

So, have you heard about Wonder Woman’s haircut yet?

If you haven’t, here’s the story in a nutshell: In the current storyline by writer Walt Simonson and artist Jerry Ordway, Wonder Woman’s suffering from amnesia, but that’s not stopping any number of dangerous folks from trying to kill her. WW’s held off her attackers thus far, but she wants to get to the bottom of this. So with the aid of a dedicated fan, she adopts a brilliant disguise – she cuts her hair and puts on a pair of glasses. The issue in question comes out this week, and the story has hit the Associated Press and other media outlets. (Glad there’s nothing else going on in the world.)

The whole thing seems silly, of course. Who cares about a fictional character’s sense of style? Then again, we’re still digging out from Oscar night fashion coverage. So why shouldn’t the big stars of the comics world get the same treatment? But the coverage also highlights the odd relationship the media, and American society in general, have with comics’ major pop culture icons. Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Spider-Man, the Hulk – we know them all, but we barely know their stories and history.

The headline of the AP article, for example, is ‘After 60 years, Wonder Woman gets a makeover.’ Now, I think it’s probably true that this is the first time Wonder Woman’s been depicted in short hair. But in the late 1960s and early 1970s, DC unveiled a new-look Wonder Woman, who eschewed her costume and most of her powers for a white jumpsuit and some crimefighting kung-fu action. In fact, the current amnesiac-out-of-costume storyline has included direct homages to those stories.

So this news isn’t really news. Even moreso because a new writer is taking over the series when this storyline is over, and it’s quite likely that everything will return to the status quo. It’s an odd pairing – the general media isn’t aware that change frequently occurs in long-running comics series, so when they do get wind of a (probably temporary) change in the status quo, they treat it as a groundbreaking alteration of our cultural landscape.

The biggest reason for this is probably that the major comics characters have transcended comics. Wonder Woman 190 was the 83rd-ranked comic for the month of March; industry analyst icv2 estimates that North American comic and pop culture stores ordered fewer than 25,000 copies. Super Friends reruns on Cartoon Network probably get more viewers; the network’s current Justice League series certainly does (to the tune of 1 million to 1.5 million). We may not remember what Wonder Woman was wearing in the comics in the 60s and 70s, but Lynda Carter’s TV version still lives on in reruns and the popular consciousness almost three decades after the fact.

It’s not just Wonder Woman, though. Batman is the top-selling title for March, with industry analyst icv2 estimating around 123,000 copies sold this month. Batman: The Animated Series drew millions of viewers when it aired on Fox and the WB in the early to mid 90s. At minimum, given Justice League’s ratings, ten times as many people are getting their notions about Batman, Superman and company from the cartoons as they are from the comics. Millions of people bought tickets to see X-Men, Spider-Man and Daredevil, but only thousands of people buy their comics.

Like Wonder Woman’s hair, this is not news. For decades, no one has really been paying much attention to the contemporary comic adventures – the comics helped establish an archetype in the pop culture consciousness once upon a time, but even by the 70s, they weren’t important enough to keep track of. This did allow for some experimentation in the comics of that time; for a while, Clark Kent was a TV reporter with no vulnerability to Kryptonite, Batman left stately Wayne Manor for a penthouse apartment in the city, and we’ve already mentioned Wonder Woman’s wardrobe changes.

In the 80s and 90s, publishers often tried to refocus attention on the comics themselves with major stunts. A reader poll led DC to kill off Robin to a hailstorm of media attention. This required mainstream journalists to grasp the difference between Dick Grayson – the Robin created in 1940 – and his 80s successor, Jason Todd. The Grayson character grew up, ditched the short pants, became Nightwing, and stars in his own series today. Todd found himself on the wrong end of an automatic dialer after only a few years. It was a difference likely lost on an audience raised on Adam West and Burt Ward, who just heard ‘Robin died’ and went crazy.

In 1993 and 1994, DC went for the whole enchilada and killed off Superman, broke Batman’s back, and turned Green Lantern into a homicidal maniac. The Death of Superman became a huge media phenomenon, as mainstream journalists somehow failed to pick up on the notion that very few characters in comics stay dead for long. But the shock events had diminishing returns, and often annoyed the existing readership without really changing the way the public at large thought of the characters. The other-media adaptations stuck to the same archetypes they always had.

Gradually, the comics publishers have decided that if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em, creating spinoff versions and alternate publishing lines whose purpose was to reflect the versions of the characters that a larger audience might be familiar with – in short, they began adapting to the adaptations. It remains to be seen if this will help draw in the mass audience that has eluded comics over the last few decades. In the worst case scenario, it could cause a stagnation in the major characters’ ongoing storylines and accelerate the sales decline as the last of the diehards leave and no new casual readers come in to replace them. In the end, comics has to find some way to change the fact that the public at large doesn’t really want to know what’s in the comics – they just want to know that they’re still there.

Finding the Spark

Posted February 1, 2003 By Dave Thomer

I don’t think I fully realized it until last week, but I lost a little bit of enthusiasm for comics over the past year. There was plenty of good work coming out, stuff I enjoyed reading and that I’m happy to have in my collection and on my bookshelf. But there was a spark missing somewhere. The books I really loved all seemed to sputter and fade in 2002. Either they were cancelled due to low sales, or they ran into scheduling problems, or the creators that made them special left to do other books. Even the few new series I did check out were good, but not outstanding. Our trips to the comics store were becoming the sort of thing we did when we got around to it, not something to specifically plan for. Sure, part of that’s because our schedules have changed radically over the last year . . . but in part, it’s because there was never anything we were in a particular rush to get.

Fortunately, I didn’t really realize that enthusiasm was gone until I got it back. Last week was the first Wednesday we made it a point to get to the comics store I could remember. (New books usually arrive in comics stores on Wednesdays.) We made the midweek trip in part to free up our weekend, but just as important to Pattie and me was this: for the first time in over two years, Kurt Busiek, Brent Anderson and Alex Ross produced a new issue of Astro City. As Pattie’s fond of saying, she nearly tackled Busiek in San Diego in 2001 to find out when the next issue was coming, so it’s fair to say we had built up some anticipation.

You know what? It was worth it. As a reintroduction to the series, it covered some old ground, but I think that just shows the strength of this series and its character-intensive approach. I didn’t mind that the narrator was telling me things about Astro City that I already knew, because he was doing it while telling me about himself. When Busiek’s at the top of his game, he makes the triumphs and failures of the everyday person come alive, and in 22 pages he made me care about a character I’d never seen before. The book looked terrific, with Ross turning in one of the best covers I’ve seen him do. Anderson uses a couple of splash pages to convey different aspects of the city, but he mostly employs a pretty dense panel structure in order to cover a lot of narrative ground and handle the amount of conversation and narration that Busiek writes. (I gotta say, it was nice to read a comic where it actually took some time to read the thing.) Astro City: Local Heroes 1 is a wonderful celebration of courage and compassion, and I am not ashamed to say that my eyes well up every time I read it. It is that damned good, and it reminded me why I love this medium.

When I finished reading the book, one of my first thoughts was ‘Why can’t I find more books like this?’ In the last week, as I’ve done my usual browsing about the web, I’ve realized that it looks like some more of those old favorites like Astro City should be making their returns in 2003. This week, it looks like Christian Gossett and his comrades at Archangel Studios will relaunch The Red Star under the auspices of CrossGen Entertainment. While that series has never gone away, it’s been a while since the last story arc concluded. If I can believe the Archangel website – and I think I can – this relaunch is the beginning of a more-frequent publication cycle, and that has me enormously excited.

Way back in May 2001, Barry Kitson told us that he and Mark Waid would be taking their Empire series over to DC’s Homage imprint. I’ve been checking the news regularly to see when this story of a successful world conqueror would be back on the shelves, and now DC’s website says we can expect it in late summer. Kitson sounds very excited about the return of a series that may as well be entitled Dave’s Favorite Creators Do The Best Work of Their Careers, so that’s one more hint that 2003’s going to be an excellent year.

DC also recently solicited a new issue of Warren Ellis, John Cassaday, and Laura DePuy’s Planetary, and even though they promptly canceled that solicitation, they did so with an announcement that Batman/Planetary will ship this summer. To an extent, I’ll believe it when I see it, but I’m in an optimistic mood. This’ll be a great series to have going during the summer blockbuster season.

Jeff Smith’s outstanding Bone series is slated to wrap up this year, and while I’ll be sorry to see it go, I can’t wait to read the conclusion and see what other projects Smith has on tap. Jay Hosler’s Sandwalk Adventures will be collected early this year, which will be fantastic. I’m looking forward to reading both of these books, and the thought that in the next few years I’ll be able to read them to my daughter makes me look forward to them that much more.

More than anything, though, what thinking about all of these returning favorites has done is get me excited about comics in general, which means I’m more likely to go hunting for new creators and new stories and find the next thing that excites me as much as any of my old favorites. I can’t wait.