Author Archive

And Now My Head A Splode

Posted January 27, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I just went to the R.E.M. home page and discovered that earlier this week, Mike Mills joined dada on stage and sang “Dizz Knee Land” with them. Apparently he also helped re-enact the “I just flipped off President George” line.

On the one hand I’m sorry I missed it, but on the other hand, I do think that if I had been at a dada show and Mike Mills showed up, they’d be picking up little bits of Dave from the floor.

Between this and the Crowded House reunion, I’m working on the assumption that 2007 is gonna be one fine musical year. Don’t let me down, guys.

Here Comes California

Posted January 26, 2007 By Dave Thomer

It looks almost certain that California is going to move its presidential primary to early February. And if California does it, other states are going to do it. We could be heading pretty close to a national primary this time around.

The one thing that I think is unequivocally bad about this is that it’s going to make candidates even more reliant on fundraising, and that always makes me nervous.

But I do like the idea of a large number of voters having a chance to evaluate the wide field of candidates. As long as I can remember, by the time Pennsylvania’s primary has rolled around, I might as well have voted for myself for the nomination for all the good it would do. Candidates will probably still pick the areas that they think they have the best shot in, but at least those areas will have a chance to make themselves heard.

I’m not sure I’ve really bought the idea that the retail campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire really makes a huge difference. Seems to me like a lot of those voters wait until the end of the campaign to start paying attention anyway – witness the big shifts that occurred in 2004 on the Democratic side and 2000 on the Republican side.

And there’s something to be said for the idea that, look, each party is picking a candidate who is going to have to run a national campaign. Why not have the nomination process actually test that capacity?

Another Victim of the Backlog

Posted January 25, 2007 By Dave Thomer

Earlier in the week, Pattie and I deleted several unwatched episodes of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip from our DVR. Once I stopped watching, I realized I had absolutely no desire to catch up. And I’m trying to figure out how this happened, given how promising everything seemed at the start.

One of the fundamental problems, and I may have written about this before, is that Sorkin is just not a very good plotter. He doesn’t seem to be interested in thinking through the consequences of anything that happens in his stories. The result is just an accumulation of things that don’t ring true, and because they don’t ring true, you don’t really care how they turn out. One of the more famous examples of this is probably Sorkin’s claim that he decided to give President Bartlet MS because he was working on a story where Bartlet needed to be sick in bed for a period, and so he figured, hey, why not give him MS. I’ve ranted about the problems of The American President ad infinitum. I think the best example of this, though, comes from Rob Reiner’s commentary on A Few Good Men. If you’ve seen the movie, you know that there’s a point at the end where Tom Cruise is cross-examining Jack Nicholson, and catches a very basic contradiction in Nicholson’s story. Reiner says that Sorkin hadn’t included this in the script – Reiner noticed the contradiction, and thought it would be something that Cruise should bring up. That’s the kind of not-seeing-how-things-fit-together that I think gets Sorkin into trouble.

I think this habit bothered me more on West Wing than it did on Sports Night because the stakes were lower on Sports Night, and the stories focused on the character intereactions a lot more. I thought Studio 60 would be the same, but instead Sorkin’s tried to use the show to discuss Big Issues, and it’s fallen flat. Plus the one major character arc that he was exploring while I was still watching the show was the romance between Matthew Perry’s and Sarah Paulson’s characters, and going back to Sports Night and the bizarre “dating plan,” it’s pretty clear to me that Sorkin has difficulties writing romances that I find believable or engaging.

Maybe I’ll check the show out again in a few weeks, but it’s definitely off my must-see radar. I guess that’s an easy way to clear the backlog.

Recycled Newspaper

Posted January 24, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I got the renewal notice for my Philadelphia Inquirer subscription. I don’t think I’m going to do it.

After the most recent round of layoffs at the Inquirer, it occurred to me to check how much of the paper’s content was being generated by the paper itself. In the front page “A” section, where the national/international news go, there are usually two or three stories by Inquirer staff writers on page 1. Inside, there might be one or two Inquirer-written sidebars. Everything else comes from the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Washington Post, or another news service. I don’t need the Inquirer for that – I can read it on the Web, or just buy my own copy of the Post from a newsstand. (I’d check into home delivery if I didn’t think Pattie would kill me.)

On the philly.com Web site, a lot of Inquirer and Daily News writers have blogs, chats and Q-and-A forums. And that’s great, but you know, analysis and opinion isn’t really the niche newspapers are suited to fill. I can get analysis and opinion from any number of blogs and web sites. Honest to god reporting, though, that takes resources and skill. It’s what I wanted to support by buying the Inquirer. But if they’re not going to give me any, why should I bother?

I opened up today’s edition of the Inquier, and there was no local analysis of the State of the Union speech. Nothing from Pennsylvania’s newly elected senator or the new representatives from the Philadelphia area. No discussion of how Pennsylvania’s new health care proposals might intersect with what Bush wants to do. Zip. What was there was recycles from the more-extensive coverage provided by the Post, the Times, or other outlets.

I don’t need to kill more trees to bring an out of date news aggregator to my doorstep once a day. And I don’t need to keep paying money for something I don’t want and that doesn’t give me what I’m paying for.

Getting Off Track

Posted January 23, 2007 By Dave Thomer

Another education class tonight, and I’m trying to process everything that we discussed. It’s weird – the economic disparities underlying education in this country, and the way those play into racial/ethnic distinctions, seems like an undercurrent of the class, and something that’s very much on the mind of the professor. But it’s not being brought to the fore in a systematic way, so that people can understand it and use it to analyze other issues.

We spent a lot of time talking about the notion of tracking in public schools tonight, for example. And as someone who took a lot of honors classes in school, I know I felt a little defensive about the idea that my own education didn’t live up to the democratic ideals I have now. And then right at the end of the discussion, someone else mentioned that so far neither we nor the textbook had discussed the contrast between public schools and expensive private schools in terms of creating separate expectations for students. Which was a really good point, but one that kind of implied that the entire discussion so far had been kind of missing a key piece, you know?

Look, I’m all for making students construct knowledge for themselves. But I still kinda think that a little more structure would be helping us do so more efficiently.

Thinking and Writing, Writing and Thinking

Posted January 22, 2007 By Dave Thomer

Thus far in the day I’ve been having trouble figuring out what to blog about today. I finally finished that reflection paper, but I’m not really sure how worthwhile that would be as a blog post. And I’ve kinda used up a lot of the pop culture thoughts I’ve had over the weekend. (“A Friend of Pat Robertson” is still a damned good song, and anyone who’s ever e-mailed me about Jake Johannsen routines may want to check out YouTube fast. I’m just sayin’.)

I think the biggest reason for the writer’s block on serious subjects is that the thing I’m thinking about is something I’m really not ready to start writing about – the 2008 presidential primaries. No candidate has really excited me enough to start working for him. And that last pronoun is deliberate. I really can not see myself supporting Hillary Clinton in the primary. (If she wins the nomination, obviously, it’s a whole new ball game.) But you know, there’s been a Bush or a Clinton in every presidential campaign since 1988, 1980 if you count vice-presidential nominations. And I know the Bush clan is responsible for most of those, but I don’t want to usher one political dynasty off the stage by bringing a new one in. If Senator Clinton were leaps and bounds above the other candidates, maybe I’d get over this concern. But at the moment I’m hard-pressed to think of anything she’s done or said that gets me particularly enthused. (And as always, if other people connect with her, more power to them and to her, and if there are more of them than there are of me, we’ll find out at the polling booth.)

Hmm. Maybe I did have something to say there after all. But at any rate, I’m just not ready to really jump into 2008, which is sucking up a lot of energy even here in Philadelphia, where we’ve got a mayoral primary coming up in just four months. And I still gotta pick a candidate there. So I may stay clear of the presidential derby for a while.

That said, Keith Olbermann’s poke at Fox and their Barack-Obama-went-to-a-Muslin-school story on tonight’s Countdown was well worth watching.

OK, So Now I’m a Colts Fan

Posted January 21, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I don’t know if they want me rooting for them, seeing as how that was little help against the Bears’ defense today for the Saints. But I gotta admit, I gave up on the Colts today. I even said to Pattie, “You know what ticks me off? I wanted a good game most of all, and it doesn’t even look like I’m gonna get that.” And then, lo and behold, tie game, back-and-forth scores, Peyton Manning leads a last-minute drive to take the lead and Tom Brady throws a game-ending interception.

Man, it’s like I walked into the Twilight Zone.

But a Super Bowl win would take the monkeys off the backs of Manning and Tony Dungy, and they’re two guys that, from everything I know of them, deserve to be seen as winners.

And I gotta admit, I love that Mastercard commercial where Manning cheers on the everyday folks after they goof.

Not So Distant Sun

Posted January 20, 2007 By Dave Thomer

It’s hitting the Australian papers that what was previously thought to be a Neil Finn solo record is now going to be an official Crowded House project, with a 12-month world tour to go with it.

Word on the official frenz.com message board is that Mark Hart is involved with the project, and since I think he helped lift the material on Together, Alone to be the strongest album that Neil Finn’s ever been involved with, I gotta say I’m already waiting to buy my tickets.

Getting to Know Me

Posted January 19, 2007 By Dave Thomer

So I had my first week back in grad school, this time working on a Master’s in Education. Right now I’m writing this blog entry because I have writer’s block on a short reflection paper I’m supposed to write about who I am and why I want to teach. I’m staring at the blank screen and thinking to myself, “Who am I? In 2-3 pages? That’s not nearly enough time for me to frame a satisfactory theory of personal identity, let alone try and apply that theory to myself!”

Yes, I know I have problems. Twelve years of philosophy you study, think as straight you will not, eh?

But this certainly isn’t the way I remember beginning grad school the last time. There, it was very much a thrown-into-the-deep-end-of-the-pool sort of thing, with no time for any kind of touchy feely stuff. We were being Serious Thinkers, don’t you know. I had a tendency to slip autobiographical material into my papers – I thought it might make them more interesting to read, and connect the material to life. But most of my instructors disapproved of that. (And in fairness, there were times I was certainly self-indulgent. And the less said about the time I slipped autobiographical detail into what was supposed to be an anonymous examination essay, the better.)

In this program, though, it seems like it’s not so focused on the theoretical stuff. Not to say that I don’t think it’s rigorous, or that I’m not taking it seriously. But reflection papers and introductory icebreakers have a role to play, because there’s a different end goal – rather than develop theoretical thinkers who might also be able to teach, the goal here is to become a better teacher, one who might possibly understand some theories better than before. And we have to have a level of self-awareness because it’s our job as teachers to get up in front of a room and essentially commit an act of performance art every day, engaging an audience and drawing out their involvement. So the social interactions, the understanding of your own thoughts and goals at the start of the process — all of that is key to the learning process.

Heck, you could probably say it’s a Deweyan learn-by-doing kind of thing. Sneaky professors.

Not Such a Captive Audience

Posted January 18, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I tell you, as someone who teaches and takes a possibly-unhealthy number of college courses, I thank my lucky stars that Amazon.com and other online booksellers have managed to thrive. At Temple, the university bookstore frequently marks up texts to the point that the used copies are close to – and sometimes more than – the cover price. Thanks to online shopping, not only can I get my books cheaper, I can get them without having to wait in ridiculous lines. Part of me is truly surprised that the college stores still do as much business as they do.

It has been an interesting cultural shift, watching more and more of my students go the online route. I have to take into account the fact that during the first week of class, there are going to be a handful of students who haven’t done the reading because they’re waiting for the text.