I still owe the blog a couple of essays on my overall thoughts about the Obama campaign, but I gotta get my two cents in on the New Yorker cover. The idea of the cover is supposedly to satire the various e-mail smears and rumor-attacks directed at both Barack and Michelle Obama and point out how ridiculous they are. And certainly I don’t think anyone who gives serious thought to the cover thinks it’s a literal depiction of anything that goes on in the Obama home. But the thing that gets me is, satire usually exaggerates the thing that it’s mocking. It’s almost the entire stock in trade of editorial cartoons. And there’s nothing in the cover image that exaggerates or distorts the people who spread/believe these rumors. There’s just a ridiculous caricature of the Obamas. So why wouldn’t a reasonable person believe that the purpose of all the exaggerated satire is to mock the Obamas and thus to support the underlying claims of those smears? It’s not simply the use of racially charged imagery that makes this a bad cover – it’s the poor design that left out the intended target.
Author Archive
On Misdirected Satire
Posted July 15, 2008 By Dave ThomerSite Was Hacked; Clean Now
Posted July 8, 2008 By Dave ThomerUPDATE: Google has finished reviewing the site and has found it to be clean; they’ll be removing the warnings from the site’s search results. The hackers were able to insert new files onto the server and insert malicious code into WordPress that created a number of problems. I’ve deleted all the malicious files, and I also deleted all the WordPress files and replaced them with clean versions I downloaded this morning. So all systems are now go.
ORIGINAL POST: I’ll update this later, but this morning I discovered that the site had been hacked. I believe the problem has been fixed; I apologize for any inconvenience, and urge you to run any spyware/malware/virus scans you may have available to you.
More of an update later today, and hopefully I’ll fix the look of the site as well – getting rid of the hacked code also took out some of my customizations.
OK, I Really Gotta Update Now
Posted July 8, 2008 By Dave ThomerMatthew Sweet has updated his web site and announced a release date for Sunshine Lies, his next album. Two tracks can be sampled at the web site, and more are available at his myspace site. So far I’m very partial to Byrdgirl, which is one song more attached than I became to his last album.
Joie Calio from Dada released three tracks to mp3.com back in 2001 from a project that, at the time, he was calling Candy Apple Black. Those sessions form the basis of Happiness in Hell, an album released under the band name X Levitation Cult. The three mp3.com tracks are on the album, with different mixes that I can’t quite get used to after six-plus years. But the rest of the album is really good power-pop.
R.E.M.’s show at the Mann Center – which included Eddie Vedder guesting on Begin the Begin and Johnny Marr on Fall on Me – is easily my favorite of the five performances I’ve seen. I was pretty impressed with opening act The National as well, but I’m trying to figure out if their studio recordings have the same vibe that appealed to me live.
One Teacher’s Year in Review
Posted June 24, 2008 By Dave ThomerWith a little distance between the school year and me, I’m trying to reflect on what went well and what still needs work. This was an important year for me; as I think I’ve mentioned, the contrasts between what I was learning and advocating in my education-related coursework and what I was doing in the classroom became very vivid. As a result, I had something of a crisis of confidence, but I think that when I fought through that I gained some resolve and some inspiration to do things better.
Going back over the year in review, here are some of the things I’m thinking about and where I want to go in the future:
Classroom Layout: I’ve always taken the path of least resistance here and stuck with the traditional rows. This spring I gave students the choice and except for a few weeks in one section, everyone also wanted to just stick with the way the desks were laid out when we walked in. But those couple of weeks have me convinced that next year I should dictate that we rearrange the desks into a circle. It does raise some potential issues with seeing the board, but it does so much to encourage students to engage each other and not just me. And I think it’s a psychological reinforcement of the idea that participation is valued.
Participation Grading: This was a major shift. I’ve always encouraged my students to ask questions and participate, but I don’t think I was structuring enough opportunities for them to do so into the course. So I added a specific participation credit to the course, and allowed students to earn credit for participation in three different ways. They could speak up in class, to ask or answer questions. They could post responses to the discussion questions I provided for each reading in course’s online discussion forum. Or they could complete journal entries in class, where I would ask them to take ten to fifteen minutes to reflect on a question or problem related to whatever we were studying. This adds a layer of record-keeping and commenting that I don’t think I was completely ready for, but it’s definitely worth it. What I need to do, though, is make the journals and online postings a two-way process, and ask the kind of follow-ups that I would ask as part of a class discussion. Again, that’s a lot of work, but I need to build it into my schedule that this is what I’m going to do. Different paths to participation can help students who might not feel comfortable in verbal discussion, but it’s on me to make sure those different paths are all robust.
Reading Guides and Discussion Questions: I used to provide review sheets near the midterm and final to help students with their studying. This year, I decided to switch things around and provide the review sheets from the get-go. One of my initial reservations about doing so is that some students might just look at the review sheets and not bother reading the text. But if I’m honest with myself, I know that many of those students won’t read the text anyway. And that’s not to say that they’re lazy or unmotivated. Reading philosophical texts, many of which are translated and use centuries-old grammar and style, can be a tough slog, and some students are going to decide that the effort/reward ratio is higher if they just come to the class and ask questions there. But if I give students the review guides, along with a list of key questions to tell them what they should be looking for in the text, the slog might seem more manageable.
Along with the these three elements, I’m continuing to work on my own organizational skills. I have a hunch that my “2040 in Review� post to the HoloWeb will conclude with a similar statement.
You Know You’re a Derelict Blogger When . . .
Posted May 28, 2008 By Dave ThomerI was about to title this “Is this mic on” post “Shaking the Cobwebs Off,” but my browser autofill informed me that I had already used “Shaking the Rust Off” as a post title. Hooboy. Gonna try to do better. For warmups, here are some random thoughts.
One thing that I hope will happen over the course of the next year is that I’ll have more motivation to read and think about public policy because I’ll have some reason to believe that we as a country – and the leaders we select to act as our representatives – will be in a better position to enact sensible policies.
In order to make that hope a little more realistic, Pattie and I spent some time volunteering with the Barack Obama campaign during the Pennsylvania primary. It was an interesting experience, and kind of weird – for all the intensity that people worked with for weeks on end, the final result seemed to be pretty much what everyone expected. Then again, I suppose those expectations were set with the belief that people would be working as hard as they did. But it’s the weird paradox of being involved with a larger effort – the more you work to be a a part of it, the more you feel like you’re a drop of water in the ocean.
Still really happy with the REM album and still looking forward to the tour.
Overall it was a good semester of teaching, I think. I explored some new ways of encouraging participation. I think I need to keep doing more of that, but I also need to figure out how to do it in an organized way that doesn’t become all-consuming timewise.
Outside of sporting events, I’ve almost stopped watching TV. Stuff is mounting on the DVR, and I just don’t have the energy to watch it. Or maybe it’s patience and focus I’m missing. Man, if I’m not focused enough to watch TV, something’s gone crazy.
Well, something else.
Fine Fan Fun
Posted April 6, 2008 By Dave ThomerRoughly a week into listening to the new REM album, Accelerate, I realized I’m having fun being an REM fan, and that hasn’t been true in a while. I’ve been walking around with my iPod, singing along with many of the tracks and probably scaring passersby. I’ve been recording TV appearances and reading reviews, and feeling downright giddy about the upcoming tour. And I don’t want to be guilty of projection, but I think part of my fun is feeling like the band is having fun. I remember watching the documentary about the Vote for Change concerts back in 2004, where REM was playing with Bruce Springsteen right around the time that Around the Sun came out. There’s a bit backstage where Michael Stipe is looking at some of the packaging for the special edition version of the CD, and he gives a copy of the album to Springsteen. But there’s a bit where he shows the album to Peter Buck, and Buck seems pretty much disinterested, and almost glum. Given what I’ve read about the band’s attitude at that time, disinterested and glum don’t seem so off the mark. This time around, Buck’s bantering with Stephen Colbert and summing up the lessons of 2004 as “Make a better record” on the Today show.
It’s a nice feeling, is what I’m saying. But if Stipe is giving interviews in 2011 talking about how the band has finally addressed its communications problems, you’re probably gonna be seeing a story on the evening news about a lunatic philosophy professor running through the streets mumbling incoherently. So let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.
Legal Tenure
Posted April 1, 2008 By Dave ThomerOK, starting tomorrow you’re probably gonna be stuck with a few days of REM blogging. But before I do, let me make a comment about one particular criticism in the Democratic presidential primary. The Clinton campaign apparently criticized Obama for calling himself a “law professor” when he was not a tenured faculty member and his title was Senior Lecturer. Now, I should probably call my lawyer brother to get his 2 cents on this, but I think it’s officially the second most ridiculous thing I’ve heard after the whole kindergarten essay thing.
I’m an adjunct. I am the epitome of the part time faculty. I have no responsibilities beyond the courses I teach – I don’t go to faculty meetings, I don’t work with grad students, I teach. My ID lists my title as “Adjunct Professor.” When I was a grad student teaching my own classes, my students called me Professor Thomer. Some still do, others call me Dr. Thomer. When people ask me what I do, I will sometimes call myself a part-time philosophy professor. Now, I would never put Professor of Philosophy on my resume, because in a formal setting, with the capital letters and all, that’s a rank I have absolutely no claim to. But in casual conversation? Who pays attention to academic rank? And who is still awake at the end of that conversation?
Speaking of the 90s
Posted February 28, 2008 By Dave ThomerSo I’m on my way to class today to give an exam, and I’m reviewing in my head the instructions I have to give about people putting away their iPods and turning off their cell phones. And I think to myself, “I certainly don’t have to tell them to turn off their pagers. Wow, technology sure has changed since I graduated from college a decade ago.”
So, of course, I go to say “Turn off your cell phones” and out comes “turn off your pagers,” and everyone gets to laugh at the out-of-touch guy. Sheesh.
Just goes to show you how funny the human brain is. In a space of ten minutes the same mind that said there was no need to say something, said that exact thing. Sometimes I think my neurons need to do a better job of talking to one another.
Well, Off the Top of My Head
Posted February 27, 2008 By Dave ThomerBill Clinton apparently takes issue with a Barack Obama ad in which he says “I don’t want to spend the next year, or the next four years, re-fighting the same fights we had in the 1990s.” Clinton responded, “what fights should we not have made?”
Well, I think it would have been nice if we could have done without the year-long scandal and impeachment trial that resulted from Bill not being able to keep his hormones in check. But that’s just me.
I’m not denying that there were policy-based fights. And I’m not denying that the Republican approach to government often involves picking fights. But Bill Clinton’s personality, biography, and choices made many of those fights personal. And it would be nice to move on from those personality-driven fights, even if that only means we get to start new ones.
The Time Crunch of Deliberation
Posted February 9, 2008 By Dave ThomerAs my noodling about deliberation intersects with my near-obsessive following of Democratic presidential delegate selection results, it is probably worth examining the undercurrent of controversy about the use of caucuses in some states to select delegates. The argument for caucuses is that they encourage interaction between voters, encourages people to stand behind their choices, and allows for some chance of voters persuading each other to change their minds. All of these are similar to the advantages proposed by deliberation. Many supporters of Hillary Clinton’s campaign have pointed out a potential downside – there is a limited time window and a long time commitment required than in a straightforward election. This drives down participation because some people are unwilling or unable to participate. As much as I have enjoyed Barack Obama’s advantage in garnering support from caucus states, I can definitely see the point here and would certainly support any state that wanted to move from a caucus to a primary. So do various deliberation schemes suffer from the same problem? Well, if you’re doing a deliberative panel to work on a specific issue, you’re going to need to build some support for lost wages, child care concerns, and similar considerations. If you wanted to do a larger-scale deliberation project, you’re probably going to need to space it out over a period of days. I think participation is worth the costs, but it’s worth looking at the practical examples in order to appreciate just how large that cost is.